Paul's Paper 3
From Mizzou Wiki
E. D. Hirsch said, “We have ignored cultural literacy in thinking about education… We ignore the air we breathe until it is thin or foul. Cultural literacy is the oxygen of social intercourse.”(Quoteworld) Cultural literacy is background knowledge that writers may assume their audience already knows. Cultural literacy is related to another term: cultural competence. Cultural competency can be defined as the ability to interact with people of other cultures. Cultural competence has four components: awareness of one’s cultural views, and one’s reactions to other cultures; Attitude towards cultural differences; knowledge of the beliefs and practices of other cultures and skills to facilitate cross-cultural interaction (Wikipedia). In the past, it has fallen on the education system to teach students both cultural literacy and cultural competence. Michael Wesch, a professor at Kansas State University, made a video, A Vision of Students Today, with the help of two hundred of his students. The video discusses issues facing college students, using statistics gathered from his class. In addition to discussing issues college students face, Wesch also brings up issues of culture. He shows that college students are still better off than people in other countries financially. One of the main points of his video is the effect technology has had on education, which he seems to believe is negative. This is not the only video Wesch has made. Two of his other videos cover issues that result from digital information and Web 2.0, Information R/evolution and The Machine is Us/ing Us. An important aspect of all of his videos appears to be dealing with technology in an educational environment. As a result of the development of technology and the ease of information retrieval because of the Internet, educators at the University of Missouri should revise their methods of teaching both cultural literacy and cultural competence.
Wesch’s video, A Vision of Students Today, brings up many points. The first issue the video brings up is the large size of classes. Almost all of my classes have been large lectures, so I can understand why some students feel this is a problem. The video also points out that very few teachers actually know students’ names. When an average class size is over a hundred, teachers can’t be expected to learn their students’ names. However, in my experience, having little personal interaction with teachers hasn’t been detrimental to my learning. As long as a teacher is able to teach the material they need to cover, not getting to know students doesn’t seem like an issue to me. The video then brings up the relevance of course material. One student says, “I complete 49% of the readings assigned to me. Only 26% are relevant to my life”. The video also brings up the issue of attendance. I know what it’s like to skip class and not do assignments. It can be difficult to motivate oneself to attend class when the class is about something that doesn’t seem relevant to life or to one’s major. When assigned reading that doesn’t interest me or seem relevant, I generally don’t read it. The issues and experiences of Wesch’s student’s are similar to mine, but the video isn’t necessarily a reflection of the experiences of all college students.
Wesch seems to have created A Vision of Students Today with people who don’t know what it is currently like to be a college student in mind. However, the video doesn’t represent all college students’ experiences. The video does a poor job of illustrating the life of a college student. Some of the issues it brought up were similar to my experiences, but overall the video offered a very simplistic view of college life. After watching the video, someone unfamiliar with student life might be led to believe that most students skip class and don’t do assignments. In the video, Wesch focuses on the negative aspects of technology. The video claims that students who bring laptops to class often browse the Internet or read Facebook. Again, this is only true of a small portion of students in my experience. Most students don’t use laptops during class, and of those that do, not all use them to do things unrelated to the class. If the video really was created with the intention of improving its viewers’ understanding of college student ecology, it does a poor job. However, there are other ways to look at Wesch’s video. Wesch’s video is rhetoric, so it would seem logical to analyze it using a rhetorical method.
Rhetoric is the art of speaking or writing effectively or persuasively. Wesch appears to use rhetoric to make his point in his video, so it makes sense to analyze his video rhetorically. While there are many rhetorical methods that could be used to analyze the video, one that focuses on arguments would fit the video best, as the purpose of A Vision of Students Today is to make a point. Toulmin’s argument model has six parts: the claim; grounds, data that supports the claim; a warrant, linking grounds to the claim; backing, additional support for the argument; a qualifier, which indicates how universally the claim is true; and the rebuttal, which deals with potential counter arguments (Changingminds.org). Wesch’s claim appears to be that the modern system of education is outdated. To support his claim, Wesch offers statistics gathered from two hundred students. The students cite large classes, irrelevant work and classes, and the distraction posed by technology as reasons the education system is not as effective as it could be. The students presumably have first hand experience with the inadequacies of the education system, making them a warrant for the claim. The students experience the education system, and are the ones it is attempting to educate, so it follows that they are probably its best judges. The video doesn’t offer any explicit qualifiers, which makes many of the statistics used as evidence potentially inaccurate because they may only apply to the students who Wesch used to gather data. The only rebuttal Wesch addresses is in regard to technology’s usefulness. While talking about the blackboard Wesch does mention that technology has some advantages that the blackboard does not, however, he fails to address any other potential arguments against his claim. Because Wesch’s video seems to be trying to persuade his audience, it can also be examined by analyzing its use of persuasive appeals.
There are three kinds of persuasive appeal that can be used in rhetoric. Logos appeals to one’s reason, usually through statistics and facts. Pathos is an appeal to emotion. Ethos is the appeal of one’s character, and is used to convince the audience that the speaker or author is a credible source (The Forest of Rhetoric). A Vision of Students Today includes all three types of persuasive appeal. The statistics gathered from Wesch’s students are an example of both logos and ethos. The fact that the statistics are gathered from students represents ethos. No one knows what it is like to be a student more than the students themselves, so they should be an accurate source of information about student ecology. The students also present information as statistics, which should appeal to the viewers’ reason. Pathos is also demonstrated in the video. One student mentions that she will be twenty thousand dollars in debt when she graduates, but the video also points out that people in some other countries make very little, both statements seem to have been included in the video to elicit an emotional response. One of Wesch’s best uses of persuasive appeal is in the video’s discussion of relevance of material to student’s lives. He presents statistics about the amount of work students must do, an obvious example of logos. But in demonstrating that students feel they are doing irrelevant work, he also invokes an emotional response.
One of the key points of Wesch’s video was the relevance of material to students’ lives. Many general education classes seem like they don’t matter, but they actually teach cultural literacy and cultural competence. Cultural literacy is background knowledge that an author might assume the reader knows; a reader needs a wide range of knowledge in order to understand different material they may read. General education courses are an excellent opportunity to expand students’ cultural literacy. College is also an excellent place to develop cultural competence. Most college campuses are very diverse, with students and faculty from many cultures. As of 2007, the University of Missouri’s student body includes over one thousand students from more than one hundred countries, with every state in the nation represented (About Mizzou). MU also provides many humanities classes related to other cultures. If a student were interested, it would be extremely easy to cultivate cultural competence through interaction with other cultures and classes. Interacting with people from other cultures is an excellent opportunity to develop culture competence. Courses that cover other cultures are also an opportunity to learn about other cultures, and possibly to become more culturally literate. However, with the development of technology and the Internet, and the ease of finding information, colleges may need to rethink their teaching strategies.
The end of A Vision of Students Today focuses on the effect technology has had on the classroom. The video states that, “Some have suggested that technology can save us…” However, the video then states that students who do bring laptops to class often use them to browse the Internet and read Facebook. The video also quotes Josiah F. Bumstead, “The inventor of the system deserves to be ranked among the best contributors to learning and science, if not the greatest benefactors of mankind.” Bumstead is referring to the chalkboard. Wesch points out that using a chalkboard is more interactive. The teacher must move around and students must actively copy information. However, chalkboards are missing many features that technology can provide. There is no simple way to provide photos, images, or videos using a chalkboard. While PowerPoint can integrate all of the features missing from a chalkboard, used poorly it encourages students to simply copy information and then stop paying attention. Used well, technology can be beneficial to the learning process. Sites like Blackboard allow students to submit assignments online and make course documents easily available. Blackboard also has rudimentary features that facilitate communication between students and teachers. This networking is another aspect that is less evident in traditional education. Wesch’s video uses Facebook as an example of distractions caused by technology, but Facebook and websites like it can be beneficial.
Through the Internet, information is easily accessible. With search engines like Google and websites like Wikipedia, information is so easily accessible that someone who knows where to look can find information about almost anything they may be looking for. With information so easily accessible, it is easier than ever to develop cultural literacy and competence without formal teaching. The Internet has had a pervasive effect on our culture, but the education system hasn’t made many changes to adapt to it. Our culture’s reliance on technology and the Internet may not be a good thing, but it does allow us to experience other cultures more easily. Through social networking websites like Facebook and Myspace someone can interact with people from different cultures. Does someone who can simply Google something they don’t understand really need to have all of the relevant background knowledge memorized? It probably couldn’t hurt, but educators should consider that the information they are teaching may not be as relevant as it used to be, and attempt to present it in a way that students will find interesting.
Michael Wesch also created two videos about technology in addition to his video about student ecology. The first video, Information R/evolution, focuses on information, and the effect technology on information. One of the main points of this video is that digital information is very different than more traditional forms of information, like books. According to the video, “Digital information has no fixed material form.” Unlike information stored in a physical medium, digital information has the potential to be constantly changed and updated. The video What is Information Literacy?, created for an English class at Otis College of Art and Design by Joan Takayama-Ogawa and Jeanne Willette, discusses many of the issues Wesch brings up in Information R/evolution. The video begins by claiming that a single modern newspaper has more written and visual information than most people in the seventeenth century would have come across in their lifetime. According to the video, facts, opinions, rumors, and lies are all information. With this in mind, the availability of information on the internet can lead to problems. Because anyone can contribute information to the internet, and often do not provide reliable sources while doing so, the lines between information presented as fact, speculation, rumor, and assumption can blur. While Wikipedia is an extremely convenient source with information on almost any subject imaginable, most articles lack reliable sources. It becomes the users’ responsibility to determine whether information should be trusted. Users must learn to separate rumors, opinions, and lies from fact; the creators of the video call this “information literacy”. They believe that information literacy includes the ability to both find and evaluate information. The video states that many kinds of literacy are necessary for a person to be information literate. The video was created for an art school, so some of the information presented in it is biased towards art students. While being literate in regard to art is probably very important to them, it is far less relevant to other majors. Cultural literacy is a key part of information literacy. The video defines cultural literacy as a combination of both cultural literacy and cultural competency as defined in this paper. Both Information R/evolution and What is Information Literacy? cover much of the same information. Wesch’s video seems to encourage viewers to draw their own conclusions, while Otis’s video states its topics as fact. Regardless of how the point is presented, the Internet is open for anyone to use and has become fundamental to our culture and through the Internet, our culture is able to find and create information with unparalleled ease. This ease has, in part, been caused by the development of Web 2.0, the subject of Wesch’s second video about technology.
Anyone who is familiar with the internet has probably heard of Facebook, Myspace, and Youtube. These are all examples of Web 2.0. The main purpose of Web 2.0 is to allow the user to interact with the site and other users. Web 2.0 obviously includes social networking websites like Facebook, and websites that consist entirely of content contributed by users, like Youtube, but it also includes almost any website where users are able to directly interact with each other or the site itself. Wesch’s third video, The Machine is Us/ing Us, begins by explaining that virtual text is “more flexible” than written text. This argument is similar to the argument in Information R/evolution about digital information being more mutable than physical text. The video goes on to explain the differences in the coding Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 are built on. With Web 2.0, users are able to add content to the internet without knowing complicated code. Wesch’s video about Web 2.0 is clearly related to his video about information. Many of the issues brought up in his information video are a result of Web 2.0. Content is easy to add to the Internet, but how can it be organized? If someone contributes information to something that already exists, who owns the information? These are both valid questions Wesch brings up in the video, and neither have a simple solution. Web 2.0 could also affect the classroom. While some people probably blame Web 2.0 for some students’ inattention in class, it isn’t the cause. Some people argue that Web 2.0 is really just a marketing term to “overhype” existing web applications like blogs, wikis, podcasts, social networking websites, and other websites that encourage user created content and interaction (Riding the Net Wave). While this may be true, the focus on interactive web applications that have resulted in today’s user-focused Internet experience deserves some distinction from the rigid, non-interactive internet of the past. There will always be students who are uninterested in class, and who will look for ways to waste time. If educators made use of Web 2.0 applications, students might have a more constructive way to spend time.
Many colleges have begun to provide students with technology in an effort to keep up with modern trends. Abilene Christian College is providing its entire incoming freshman with either an iPhone or an iPod Touch. The phones will be used to provide students with information about homework, to take quizzes and surveys in class, and to check their financial information (ACU). Lyon University in Arkansas will provide laptops to all of its students (Lyon’s 1:1 Laptop Program). One benefit of providing students with iPods is that it allows the students to listen to instructor created content. Some professors now make podcasts of lectures available online. At Middlebury College, students enrolled in a summer language program were provided with iPods containing audio files selected by instructors. Some students used the iPod to record audio for homework assignments. At the end of the program, the iPods were returned to data could be gathered. The results of the study revealed that few students used the iPods for anything other than the intended educational purpose. Most students who participated in the study felt that the iPod was helpful (Middlebury Case Study). An informal study by a professor at Georgia Tech revealed that students may learn better by listening to lectures on iPods or computers. The study consisted of two sections of an advanced computer science course. One section was taught in a traditional lecture, while the other viewed lectures on computers or iPods. The course content, homework, and tests were identical. The section who viewed the lectures outside of class had grades about ten-percent higher than students in the section with in class lectures. While the study was informal, it does demonstrate the potential usefulness of technology (Students Learn Better via iPod). While most of the technological innovations implemented by colleges are beneficial and convenient, they can also cause problems. Classroom problems can arise from the convenience of technology. A professor at UC Berkeley made audio and video recordings of lectures, along with copies of his lecture notes, available for his students. At times, as few as about twenty students attended the lecture out of two hundred (iPod Took My Seat). Students skipping lectures is nothing new. Even without computers, cell phones, and iPods, people could still skip lectures and get notes from friends, but it is easy for students to abuse the opportunity provided by their professors. Cheating is another problem that arises from technology. Cell phones with text messaging or cameras can be easily exploited, allowing students to share test answers. However, technology also makes it easier for teachers to check papers for plagiarism (Technology Enables Cheaters). The University of Missouri hasn’t gone as far as providing students with iPods or encouraging professors to post podcasts of their lectures, but it has taken small steps to embrace some of the more simple aspects of technology.
While the University of Missouri hasn’t gone so far as to give student’s iPods or laptops, students are able to rent laptops from the library, there are computer labs and classrooms with computers in many buildings, and the majority of the campus has wireless internet available. The university also provides students Bengal space, which allows them to save and access files from anywhere on campus, or even off campus with additional software. MU students are also able to use Software Anywhere to access some software required for a few courses from home, for free. Many professors use blackboard, and while I have never heard of an MU professor posting audio or video recordings on lectures, many professors do post lecture notes or power point slides used in the lecture. In many of the lectures I’ve taken, after the first week or two of class attendance drops noticeably and students begin to rely on lecture notes that are posted. There is no simple solution to attendance problems in large lectures. Taking attendance isn’t feasible in a class so large the professor isn’t able to recognize students. Without using some kind of biometrics, things like fingerprint scanners and other ways to uniquely identify individuals, there is no way to ensure accurate attendance data. Attendance isn’t a new issue brought created by technology, it is simply easy for technology to compound the problem. For now, it may be best if MU continues to use proven technology until some of the potential problems associated with more cutting edge technology can be resolved. The University of Missouri may not have embraced technology to the degree that some other schools have, but it has ensured that its students have resources available that allow them to make use of most common modern technology.
Wesch’s A Vision of Students Today addresses many of the issues that college students face. The video focuses on technology as a distraction, however, Wesch does point out some of the positive aspects of technology. The blackboard he writes on has a list of things the blackboard is missing: photos, video, animations, and networking. These are all things that can be provided by technology. For the most part however, Wesch’s first video ignores these benefits and focuses on technology as a distraction. Most educators haven’t adapted their curriculum to make use of technology, which has led to technology’s use as a distraction by students. Wesch’s other videos present technology in a much more positive light. The Internet makes information easy to find; it also makes it possible to communicate with people from other cultures. The development of Web 2.0 has revolutionized the internet and the way people learn and communicate. If the development of cultural literacy and competence is the main goal of general education classes at the University of Missouri, but students can develop both on their own time through technology, then the classes should be changed to be more relevant. Technology is only the distraction Wesch presents it as because our system of education doesn’t use it effectively. If the University of Missouri were to use technology to its fullest, many of the problems that it appears to cause could potentially be avoided.
Works Cited:
"About Mizzou." University of Missouri. 23 July 2008 <http://www.missouri.edu/about/>.
"ACU First University in Nation to Provide IPhone or IPod Touch to All Incoming Freshmen." ACU News. Abilene Christian University. 23 July 2008 <http://www.acu.edu/news/2008/080225_iphone.html>.
Burton, Gideon O. "The Forest of Rhetoric." Silva Rhetoricae. College of Humanities, Brigham Young University. 25 July 2008 <http://humanities.byu.edu/rhetoric/silva.htm>.
"Cultural Competence." Wikipedia. 25 July 2008 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_competence>.
Greengard, Samuel. "Riding the Net Wave." EDTECH. 23 July 2008 <http://www.edtechmag.com/higher/updates/riding-the-net-wave.html?cm_sp=higherd-_-ResourceLink-_-Riding+The+Net+Wave>.
McCloskey, Paul. "GT Prof: Students Learn Better Via IPod Versus Lecture." Campus Technology. 13 Mar. 2007. 23 July 2008 <http://campustechnology.com/articles/45383>.
"Middlebury College Case Study." EDUCAUSE. 23 July 2008 <http://www.educause.edu/ELI/ELIDiscoveryToolGuidetoPodcast/MiddleburyCollegeCaseStudy/13059?time=1216867247>.
Nagel, David. "Lyon's 1:1 Laptop Program Aims to 'Level the Playing Field' for Students." Campus Technology. 26 June 2008. 23 July 2008 <http://campustechnology.com/articles/64734_1/>.
QuoteWorld. 27 June 2008 <http://www.quoteworld.org/quotes/6587>.
Raboteau, Albert. "The Same Technology That Enables Cheaters Also Helps Nab Them." Roanoke Times. 21 Aug. 2006. 23 July 2008 <http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke/wb/79049>.
Silverstien, Stuart. "The IPod Took My Seat." Las Angeles Times. 17 Jan. 2006. 23 July 2008 <http://articles.latimes.com/2006/jan/17/local/me-noshow17>.
Straker, David. "Toulmin's Argument Model." ChangingMinds.Org. 14 Nov. 2004. 25 July 2008 <http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/making_argument/toulmin.htm>.
Takayama-Ogawa, Joan, and Jeanne Willette. "What is Information Literacy? (Otis College)." Youtube. 14 Mar. 2007. Otis College of Art and Design. 23 July 2008 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeopJX5jJV8>.
Wesch, Michael. "A Vision of Students Today." Youtube. 12 Oct. 2007. Kansas State University. 25 July 2008 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGCJ46vyR9o>.
Wesch, Michael. "Information R/Evolution." Youtube. 12 Oct. 2007. Kansas State University. 25 July 2008 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4CV05HyAbM>.
Wesch, Michael. "The Machine is Us/Ing Us (Final Version)." Youtube. 08 Mar. 2007. Kansas State University. 25 July 2008 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g>.
