Yancey:
How Yancey’s text reads like a web page. A plurality of narratives instead of a single thread. Find one you like. Jump back and forth. Read the images.
“All of which leads me to
ask: how many compositions
are in this text?” 300
Poses the good question: “ How is it that what we teach and what we
test can be so different from what
our students know as writing?” 298-99
“the members of the writing
public have learned—in this case, to write, to
think together, to organize, and to act within these
forums—largely without instruction and, more to the
point here, largely without our instruction. 301
We are at a moment in our technological advances comparable to 19th c. inventions when technology again facilitated a circulation of writing.
“what ever the exchange value may be for these writers—and there are millions of
them, here and around the world—it’s certainly not
grades. Rather, the writing seems to operate in an
economy driven by use value” 300-01
So, if this is the moment of in composition, where student writing doesn’t match what we teach, where the students write without instruction and have a use focused agenda in circulating there writing…where does that leave us?
First moment: tremors
English departments per se are disappearing and in their place, things like communications and humanities, down by 1/3!! We are becoming ‘irrelevant’.
Second moment: refocus, reorganization.
Refocus ourselves: “Still, too often we define ourselves
as that first-year course. Suppose that if instead of focusing on
the gatekeeping year, we saw composition education as a gateway? Suppose
that we enlarged our focus to include both moments, gatekeeping
and gateway?” 306
Instructor who tried to get as many students to drop as possible…
Reorganize the course: “it becomes pretty clear that we already inhabit a model of communication
practices incorporating multiple genres related to each other, those
multiple genres remediated across contexts of time and space, linked
one to the next, circulating across and around rhetorical situations both
inside and outside school.
This is composition—and this is the content of composition” 308
Third Moment: Back to the Drawing Board
“At this moment, we need to focus on three changes: Develop a new
curriculum; revisit and revise our writing-across-the-curriculum efforts;
and develop a major in composition and rhetoric” 308
What will the new developments be? Social/collaborative process/revision oriented instruction…
“To put the
point directly, composition in
this school context, and in direct
contrast to the world context,
remains chiefly focused on the
writer qua writer, sequestered
from the means of production” 309
Again, Latour…gathering/extending information
pointers for new curriculum: circulation and real world, best medium, transfer between media, prepares them for writing public
“So to study text production, text reception, text meaning,
text value apart from their animating activities is to miss the core of
text’s being” 312
Interesting way this has been done…marginalia. The Blake/Reynolds feud again.
a second kind of circulation equals revision… 315
Remediation, revision. Cant do it all in first year course, just the beginning.
As texts and text productions circulate:
“the canons interact, and through that interaction they contribute
to new exigencies for invention, arrangement, representation, and
identity. Or: they change what is possible” 317
“In other words, you can only invent inside
what an arrangement permits—and different media permit different arrangements” 317
So I guess new media papers are n dimensional instead of one dimensional…
The arrangement then, must match the intention. Composition becoming more poetic. Form itself as a nuanced piece of information about the composition.
Fourth Moment: It is time to change
“technology. If we continue to partition it off
as just something technical, or outside the parameters governing
composing, or limit it to the screen of the course management system,
or think of it in terms of the bells and whistles and templates of
the PowerPoint screen, students in our classes learn only to fill up
those templates and fill in those electric boxes—which, in their ability
to invite intellectual work, are the moral equivalent of the dots on
a multiple choice test. Students will not compose and create, making
use of all the means of persuasion and all the possible resources
thereto; rather, they will complete someone else’s software package;
they will be the invention of that package”
320
Equals writing for a reason and to an unlimited audience///is that so different after all?